CATERPILLAR by Koji Wakamatsu

January 19, 2010 by: Dissidenz International

Original title: Caterpillar
Produced by Wakamatsu Production
Japan – 2010 – 85 min.
World premiere: Berlin Film Festival 2010 (Official Competition)
Silver Bear for Best Actress for Shinobu TERAJIMA

Caterpillar (2010) by Koji Wakamatsu alt=”Caterpillar by Koji Wakamatsu” title=”Caterpillar (2010) by Koji Wakamatsu” width=”226″ height=”300″ class=”aligncenter size-medium wp-image-21″ />

SYNOPSIS
During the Second Sino-Japanese War, in 1940, Lieutenant Kurokawa returns home as a honoured and decorated soldier… but deprived of his arms and legs lost in the battle in mainland China. All hopes, from the villagemen and women to close family members, turn to Shigeko, the Lieutenant’s wife: she must honour the Emperor and the country in setting an example for all by fulfilling her duty and taking care of the ‘god soldier’…




DIRECTOR’S STATEMENT

In war human beings are violated, chopped up and burnt by other human beings.
Humans violating other humans.
Humans chopping up other humans.
Humans burning other humans.

Is there such a thing as a just war? Before the arrival of billowing mushroom clouds, falling incendiary shells or large-scale massacres, there were brightly lit houses filled with men, women, the aged and children— human beings. It was there that they ate and slept, ate and slept; living their routine lives.

What is the meaning of war? What is the meaning of people killing people for the sake of their country? Where in the world can we find a just war?

Don’t forget the stench of blood that covered the earth!
Don’t forget the smell of burnt flesh!
We must not forget… for this is what war is.

Over 140,000 people died in the Hiroshima Atomic bomb attack.
Over 70,000 people died in the Nagasaki Atomic bomb attack.
984 class B and C war criminals were sentenced to death.
Over 100,000 died in the Bombing of Tokyo.
Over 20 million died in the Asian continent.
Over 60 million died in World War II.

INTERVIEW WITH KOJI WAKAMATSU

What was the genesis of the film?
I had the idea for this new film while I was shooting United Red Army. I felt that, in order to understand the youngsters of the 60s and 70s, you should first describe their parents’ era, the time of the Pacific War. Describing a war doesn’t just mean describing the shooting and the battles.
The people who are most affected by war are the women and children, who don’t even fight.
Those in power fooled the citizens into believing that this war was on behalf of their country, and they manipulated them into rushing into the war. They themselves stayed at a safe distance and were still alive after the war. I thought that the youngsters in United Red Army were born the way they were precisely because their parents had lived through such an era. So I’d already decided at the time of shooting to describe their parents’ era, the Pacific War, and the people of that time.

In what way is the film different from Edogawa Rampo’s novel The Caterpillar, which is about a WWII veteran, who returns home as a quadriplegic?
I was inspired by this image in the novel of the disabled war veteran, who’s lost all his limbs, and his relationship with his wife. Apart from that, the timesetting is different, and so is pretty much everything else.
What I wanted to describe from that initial image was the idea that, for human beings, life means sex, eating and violence.
Moreover, I wanted to describe how human nature can be destroyed by war.
Charlie Chaplin showed us through his cinema that for killing three people you’ll be hanged, whereas you’ll be a hero if you kill ten thousand. That’s war!

In Johnny Got His Gun (1971), American novelist and director Dalton Trumbo tells the story of a World War I soldier, who lost his arms, legs, and face after being caught in the blast of an exploding artillery shell. Have you seen that film?
Yes, I’ve seen it. I saw a human being completely deprived of freedom by war, and I felt how cruel it was that he couldn’t even choose to die. But I don’t think it had any influence on me. Compared to that, at least Kyuzo could choose his own death.

Where did you get the archives images from?
I borrowed them off a person who had got them from the United States National Archives and Records Administration.
After the war, minor Japanese war criminals were put on trial and punished in various places in Japan. They were also executed under the pretext that it was for the good of their country. But among these there were many Koreans, who had been brought from the Korean peninsula, which was a Japanese colony at that time. They too were put on trial as Japanese war criminals, and were also executed.
Some South and North Koreans, initially accused of being war criminals but later acquitted, were released. They are still ignored by the Japanese government today, and have had no post-war reparation because they aren’t Japanese.
From this point of view, the war still hasn’t finished. Nothing has been resolved.

Where did you shoot the film?
The film was shot in Nagaoka and around in Niigata prefecture, in the Chubu region (northwest of Tokyo), where there exists typical Japanese landscapes preserved from fifty years ago with traditional wooden straw roof houses surrounded by rice terraces. It was in that rural part of the country known for its high-quality rice where the farmers used to cultivate the rice to feed soldiers during the war and the village people were fully dedicated to the Emperor. I wanted to shoot in that area, not as much for aesthetic or scenic reasons, than for historical reasons –and maybe also because I grew up in a similar village!

Tell us more about the character played by Katsuyuki Shinohara, the character that eats flowers and doesn’t do anything like the others.
He’s me. He’s the me who has been strongly criticised as an aho, an “idiot”, as a “national disgrace”, as a “sewer”. But by the side of the sewer there blooms a single flower. That’s why I made Katsuyuki eat a flower and so on. In this film his character pretends to be an idiot and goes against the current of plunging into this war. He sticks to his belief of “refusing to do what he hates”. I think he’s probably the most courageous character.

What about the casting of Shinobu Terajima and Shima Ohnishi?
As for casting Ohnishi, I’d decided to use him for my next film during the shooting of United Red Army. To play a soldier without limbs, you have to use your eyes a great deal. Ohnishi is very expressive with his eyes.
As for Terajima, she really suits those Japanese farmer’s trousers, monpe. Also, she’s my favourite actress, because she has the courage to act without make-up, even though she’s a huge star.
I wasn’t sure if such a great actress would accept to appear in a film whose director has been the object of such criticism. But when I plucked up the courage to ask her, she accepted.

There are two stories in Caterpillar: the story of a hero that lost his limbs in a war and the story of a husband and wife. What’s the relationship between the two stories?
Japanese society is basically a man’s society. Men have shamelessly used violence on their wives, they’ve considered their wives as mere outlets for their sexual desires and as machines for producing children. In Japanese society, this kind of relationship between men and women used to be considered normal. Even today, a member of parliament can make statements based on this mindset, that “women are machines for producing children”. I wanted to describe how the relationship between a husband and wife could change into other forms in this society as a result of war. In short, I wanted to describe the way human beings live, by grouping the state, the nation and everything together.
By doing this, I thought I could describe how war is nothing more than killing. Wars for justice, wars for national profit, wars on behalf of democracy… such things don’t exist. Men kill other men, that’s war! How many people have been killed in the name of justice?
After going through the 20th century, which was a century of war, the same situation is still prevailing in the 21st century.
There are no justifiable wars. That’s what I wanted to describe.

Is the way women are described in your films (initially being abused but then taking the upper hand) a metaphor somehow?
There’s no clear metaphor. It’s an image in my head. My films are born inside my head, where all sorts of things are jumbled up. There’s myself, my friends, my country, my mother and father, whom I observed while I was growing up…
My father was violent to my mother when he was drunk.
All these things are in a disorderly mess in my brain. I can’t explain it logically, of course. If I could, I’d be a novelist. I wouldn’t need much money or any staff, and it’d be a lot easier. But as I can’t express all this in words, I use images and noises, including music. That’s all.

You are known as a guerrilla-style filmmaker (making single shots, no rehearsals, shooting and editing in a very short time etc)…
When you do lots of rehearsals, the actors’ tension eases off. If you kill somebody, you don’t practise it lots of times, do you? You just concentrate on that one thing. This is the same. When you’re looking out for a single chance, you don’t need a rehearsal.

What influence does a limited budget have? Do you think a big budget would have changed anything about Caterpillar?
To manage within a limited budget is the Wakamatsu way. Merely having lots of money doesn’t guarantee you’ll shoot something good. Nevertheless, every day during the shooting I wished I had a bigger budget. For example, I could have had more extras in a line if I’d had a bigger budget, and so on. But because you can’t do that you have to rely on actors’ expressions, and you can express these things well. When you have money, you rely on it. But it won’t necessarily produce good work.
We finished the shooting in twelve days, although we’d planned for two weeks. It took about thirteen hours to edit the film, because we changed it three times.
The script took at least three months, shaping our ideas and establishing the concept.

Your stance as a film director has been changing, from defending the armed struggle in the 1970s to criticising it in United Red Army, and becoming strictly anti-war in Caterpillar. Can you explain the change so far and your plans for the future?
Actually, in the 1970s I believed that we could change the world through armed struggle. But after that, certain ideas started germinating in my mind. Japan and other Asian countries won’t solve their problems through an armed struggle, and maybe the last effective armed struggles happened at the time of Ché Guevara and Castro.
Furthermore, after doing research and thinking about various things while shooting United Red Army, I finally realised that it’s impossible to change anything through armed struggle. I came to the thinking that things could only be solved through the power of the human spirit, and not by military force.
I don’t hold with these former militants, who used to call for armed struggle and a “simultaneous world revolution”, but who now just use their notoriety to defend their own positions. All they do is spout theories, without accepting how times have changed.
As for what I’m going to portray in the future, it’ll probably be just about men and women. I’m thinking about describing the nastiness of human beings, the sordid part of relationships. On the other hand, I’m interested in the story of Otoya Yamaguchi, a 17-year-old who stabbed the president of the Socialist Party of Japan to death, and then killed himself. He was just a boy who thought he was making the world better, and he died for it.
When all’s said and done, I think I’ll just go on describing human beings.

Why, and for whom, do you make films?
Why? I make them because I want to make them – for myself, as well as for anybody who watches my films and feels a hatred for war. And it’s also to make a living. The starting point is when I get angry. There are things that make me angry, so I simply express my feelings by using this device called a film.




CAST

Shigeko KUROKAWA: Shinobu TERAJIMA
Kyuzo KUROKAWA: Shima OHNISHI
Kenzo KUROKAWA: Ken YOSHIZAWA
Tadashi KUROKAWA: Keigo KASUYA
Chiyo KUROKAWA: Emi MASUDA
The village chief: Sabu KAWAHARA
The wife of the village chief: Maki ISHIKAWA
The Headquarters officer: Daisuke IIJIMA
Chinese woman #1: Maria ABE
Chinese woman #2: Mariko TERADA
Chinese woman #3: Yasuyo SHIBA
Japanese soldier: Ryo MUKUTA
Yayoi: Taneko
Toshiko: Naoko ORIKASA
Villageman #1: Sanshiro KOBAYASHI
Villageman #2: Takaaki KANEKO
Military officer #1: Go JIBIKI
Military officer #2: ARATA
KUMA: Katsuyuki SHINOHARA
The voice of the radio: Ichiro OGURA

CREW

A Wakamatsu Production, Inc. and Skhole Corporation Production

Producer
Koji WAKAMATSU

Co-producer
Noriko OZAKI

Screenplay
Hisako KUROSAWA
Deru DEGUCHI

Line Producer
Takahito OBINATA

Cinematographer
Tomohiko TSUJI
Yoshihisa TODA

Camera assistant
Yusaku MITSUWAKA

Lighting Director
Reiji OKUBO

Lighting assistants
Taku TAKAHASHI
Mio WAKISAKA

Musical Director
Mamoru KO

Music
Sally KUBOTA
Yumi OKADA

Musicians
Aya NAKAMOTO
MITUKO
Mai TANAKA

Sound Mixer
Yukio KUBOTA

Boom operator
Chinsui SON

Editor
Shuichi KAKESU

Assistant editors
Kumiko SAKAMOTO
Momoko ISHIDA

Art Director
Hiromi NOZAWA

Assistant directors
Orie FUKUSHI
Eri HANAKI
Soichiro ODA
Daisuke SUDA

Wardrobe
Masae MIYAMOTO

Assistant Wardrobe
Chino KOMATSU

VFX Supervisor
Masaru TATEISHI

VFX Director
Kazuhiro NISHIO

Special Make-up Supervisor
Akiteru NAKADA

Special Make-up Artists
Fumie IIDA
Takahiro HASHIMOTO

Making Of
Tetsu KIMATA

Casting
Ryoji KOBAYASHI

Comments

7 Responses to “CATERPILLAR by Koji Wakamatsu”
  1. sfo Dori-ko says:

    Thank goodness some SANE statement comes out of the crazy omnipresent madness of the denial in Japan of the tragedy of being ruled by a military run government of the 1920-40s of Japan. The Mombusho is still not able to educate the impact of the tragedy of that period and one wonders when the truth of the oppression breaks through to the general populace.

    Keep up the filmwork Director Wakamatsu!! There are fewer and fewer truthtellers about the tragedy of war vs. the media hype.

    USA

  2. Vitória says:

    I loved this movie. Brave, smart, profound and feminist.